<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>면세용역 on TaxDesk Insight</title><link>https://insight.taxdesk.kr/tags/%EB%A9%B4%EC%84%B8%EC%9A%A9%EC%97%AD/</link><description>Recent content in 면세용역 on TaxDesk Insight</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>ko-kr</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://insight.taxdesk.kr/tags/%EB%A9%B4%EC%84%B8%EC%9A%A9%EC%97%AD/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>산후도우미 알선 용역, 인적용역 면세 인정 (조심2025구1959)</title><link>https://insight.taxdesk.kr/posts/2026-06-28-postpartum-care-vat-exempt/</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://insight.taxdesk.kr/posts/2026-06-28-postpartum-care-vat-exempt/</guid><description>산후도우미 알선 용역이 부가세 과세대상이 아닌 인적용역 면세 대상이라고 본 사례. 면세 조항 간 요건 구조의 차이가 결정적 근거.</description></item></channel></rss>